Microsoft Sued for Rescinding Offer Following Background Check
Posted Thursday, January 15th, 2009 by
Estimated Reading Time:
HRRecruitingAlert’s Sam Narisi just posted a great story about a case where Microsoft was sued and found liable for rescinding a job offer after it found adverse information on the candidate’s background check. I had always been under the impression that a conditional offer could be made pending the successful completion of the check. It turns out that this is correct, however there’s a little wrinkle everyone should pay attention to in Schley v. Microsoft Corp. See post below.
Offer Rescinded After Background Check: Can Candidate Sue?– By Sam Narisi
Your company offers a candidate the job — then rescinds after his background check uncovered a felony conviction. He sues, claiming he was promised a job, quit his old position and bought a house in preparation to relocate. Who wins?
That’s what happened in one recent case:
A candidate, living in New Jersey at the time, was offered a job at Microsoft’s headquarters in Redmond, Washington. He received a written offer letter, which stated his employment was at-will and the offer was conditional on a successful background check.
He also spoke with the hiring manager, who encouraged him to quit his current job and begin looking at houses in Washington. He recommended specific neighborhoods and gave him the name of a real estate agent to contact.
The candidate quit his job and purchased a house. However, his criminal background check uncovered a felony conviction, and he didn’t get the job after all.
He sued Microsoft, claiming the company asked him to leave his employer and move across the country under the promise of a new job.
Did manager promise a job?
Microsoft tried to have the case thrown out. It pointed to the letter, which told the candidate he would be an at-will employee and that the offer would be canceled if his background check didn’t come back clean.
But the judge didn’t buy it. The offer letter may have stated that the offer was conditional, but the hiring manager went too far in encouraging the candidate to relocate and helping him buy a house.
The company now faces an expensive trial or a hefty settlement.
The bottom line: Microsoft took the right steps in the wording of its offer letter. And the manager may have just been trying to help, but it’s best not to get involved in a potential employee’s personal affairs before the job offer is finalized.
In this case, it didn’t pay to be helpful. Employers take note.
This publication is for informational purposes only and nothing contained in it should be construed as legal advice. We expressly disclaim any warranty or responsibility for damages arising out this information. We encourage you to consult with legal counsel regarding your specific needs. We do not undertake any duty to update previously posted materials.